How many administrators are necessary?
Great question. Back in 2012, BMCC had just 2 administrators: the VP of instruction and the President. Flash forward 10 years, and despite the student population declining and faculty cuts, there are now 5 administrators: 3 deans (one to oversee student success, one to oversee the transfer program, and one for career technical) who all report to the VP of instruction, and the President. The interesting thing about the administrative bloat in higher education is, literally, nobody knows who all these people are or what they’re doing. See the Forbes Article Bureaucrats and Buildings for more.
The new BMCC Budget for 2022-2023 even identifies the need for MORE administrators, suggesting expenses for a new Dean of Student Affairs and an Institutional Research and Planning Director. Are these wise investments of a limited budget? Will they enhance or enrich the student experience? Data suggests--- NOT as strong evidence suggests expensive administrative staff are not succeeding at their putative role on college campuses. Rather it is the faculty, who students regard as central to their collegiate experience. See Abram’s Article Professors Not Administrators for more information[a].
[a]I wonder if it would make the argument stronger to work in the fact that another part of the story is cutting administrators from the budget to then eventually create more administrators. We used to have a marketing department, but it got cut in the last round of cuts. I believe that we used to have something very close to a Dean of Student affairs but then it was left unfilled so that it could be cut from the budget. Only, a year later for these positions to be added back when more faculty are cut. Everyone has taken some cuts over the years but only the faculty get added back at a much slower pace than other positions.